Verification Portal

Every mathematical claim in this framework is backed by a SymPy verification script. No calculation appears in documentation without a passing script. Below are curated highlights — the full set of 735+ scripts is available on GitHub.

735
Verification scripts
99.8%
Pass rate
All tests automated
8
Physics domains
CODATA 2022
Reference data
+ PDG 2022

Start here(8 scripts)

Start hereFine Structure Constant

Fine Structure Constant (alpha)

Derives 1/alpha = 137 + 4/111 entirely from division algebra dimensions. Sub-ppm accuracy (0.3 ppm) with zero free parameters.

Precision
0.3 ppm
Start hereWeinberg Angle

Weinberg Angle (tree + one-loop)

Tree-level sin^2(theta_W) = 28/121 from democratic bilinear principle, plus one-loop correction structure. 800 ppm tree gap analyzed.

Precision
800 ppm (tree)
Start hereCosmology

Hubble Constant (H_0)

Derives H_0 = 337/5 = 67.4 km/s/Mpc from fourth-power prime family. Exact match to Planck 2018 CMB value within measurement uncertainty.

Precision
Exact to reported precision
Start hereCosmology

Dark Energy Density (Omega_Lambda)

Derives Omega_Lambda = 137/200 = 0.685 connecting the fine structure constant to cosmological expansion.

Precision
0.3%
Start hereCosmology

Matter Density (Omega_m)

Derives Omega_m = 63/200 from Hilbert-Schmidt equipartition with dual-channel counting. 63 dual-role generators out of 200 total contributions.

Precision
0.04 sigma
Start herePure Mathematics

CONJ-A3: Algebraic Independence (pure math)

Proves R^4 and R^7 structures cannot coexist in a common norm-multiplicative algebra. Forces n_d^2 + n_c^2 = 137, not (n_d + n_c)^2 = 225. Uses Radon-Hurwitz obstruction.

Precision
Exact (theorem)
Start hereParticles & Masses

Three Generations of Fermions

Three independent mechanisms trace the generation count to dim(Im(H)) = 3. Strongest: Hom(H, R^7) decomposes into exactly 3 quaternionic channels.

Precision
Exact
Start hereQuantum Mechanics

Schrodinger Equation from Projection

Derives the Schrodinger equation, Born rule, and uncertainty principle from dimensional projection of a higher-dimensional wave onto 3D.

Precision
Exact (derivation)

Run them yourself

1. Requirements

Python 3.8+ and SymPy. That's it.

pip install sympy mpmath
2. Run any script

Each script is self-contained with PASS/FAIL output.

cd verification/sympy/ python alpha_enhanced_prediction.py
3. Check the output

Every script prints explicit PASS or FAIL for each test.

Test 1: 137.036036... [PASS] Test 2: error < 1 ppm [PASS]

Verification methodology

What each script does

  • States all assumptions explicitly with [A]/[I]/[D] tags
  • Performs the calculation using exact rational arithmetic (SymPy)
  • Compares against measured values (CODATA 2022 / PDG 2022)
  • Prints explicit PASS/FAIL for every test assertion

What this proves (and doesn't)

  • The arithmetic is correct (verified computationally)
  • The formulas match measurement to stated precision
  • ! Does NOT prove the derivation chain is physically correct
  • ! Numerology risk: right numbers, possibly wrong reasons

Full script repository

All 735 verification scripts are open source. Clone the repo and run them all.

GitHub repository link will be available at launch.