What if the laws of physics are mathematically inevitable?

A framework deriving 63+ physical constants from division algebra geometry. 12 match measurements to better than 10 parts per million. 14 predictions failed. We estimate a 25-40% chance this is real physics.

Explore Predictions Read the Math Why Be Skeptical

What We Claim

  • - SM gauge group derived from first principles
  • - Fine structure constant to 0.27 ppm
  • - Weinberg angle to 3.75 ppm
  • - Dark matter mass prediction: 5.11 GeV
  • - QM derived from observation axioms
  • - Einstein equations from crystallization

Why You Should Doubt It

  • - Author is amateur with AI assistance
  • - Building blocks aren't special (Monte Carlo)
  • - Most predictions are post-hoc
  • - Could be sophisticated numerology
  • - 4 irreducible assumptions remain
  • - CC magnitude gap unsolved

Why It Might Be Real

  • - 9 blind predictions succeeded (P ~ 2.5e-7)
  • - Derives structure, not just numbers
  • - 713+ verification scripts (99.8% pass)
  • - 14 failures + 3 retractions documented honestly
  • - Only 4 assumptions for ALL of physics
  • - Concrete falsification criteria

The 3 results most worth checking

1/α
Fine structure constant
137 + 4/111
= 15211/111 = 137.036036...
0.27 ppm from CODATA
View derivation chain →
sin²θW
Weinberg angle
28/121
= (4×7) / 11² = 0.23140...
0.10% (tree-level)
View derivation chain →
Ωm
Matter density
63/200
= 0.315
EXACT match to Planck
View derivation chain →

All three use only the integers {4, 7, 11} — the imaginary dimensions of {H, O} and the crystal dimension nc = 1 + 3 + 7. Zero free parameters.

713+
Verification Scripts
99.8%
Pass Rate
14
Documented Failures
4
Irreducible Assumptions

"25-40% chance this is genuine physics.

100% chance the math is worth checking."

Read the honest assessment