Predictions Registry

Blind predictions locked before measurement, falsified claims documented honestly, and upcoming experimental tests.

9
Blind Predictions
12
Sub-10 ppm
14
Falsified
8
Testable Now

Bold Claims

Structural predictions and solutions to open physics problems. These can't be numerology — they predict what exists and what doesn't.

Topology

No Magnetic Monopoles

Standard theories explain monopole absence by saying inflation diluted them. This framework says they can't exist.

SO(11) has π1 = Z/2Z, so monopoles pair-annihilate. Topological argument, not fine-tuning.

Script: magnetic_monopole_absence.py (26/26 PASS)
BBN

Lithium-7 Problem Solved

For 40 years, BBN has predicted 3× too much lithium-7. The framework explains why.

Li-7 nucleus (A=7=ImO) is suppressed by 1/3 during crystallization because 7 isn't a division algebra dimension.

Script: lithium7_crystallization.py
Cosmology

Hubble Tension is Real Physics

The 5-sigma discrepancy between CMB and local H0 measurements isn't a systematic error — it's a prediction.

Hlocal = HCMB × 13/12. Interior stress distributes across H+O = 12 gauge dimensions. 8.3% enhancement.

Falsification: if tension resolves to a single value, framework is wrong.

QCD

Strong CP Solved Without Axions

Why is θQCD = 0? Most theories need an undiscovered particle (axion). The framework gets it for free.

Parity structure of crystallization naturally forces θ = 0. No new particles required.

Structural

12 Non-Observations Predicted

The framework predicts 12 things that DON'T exist — and none have been observed.

No magnetic monopoles No proton decay No extra dimensions No 4th generation No tree-level FCNC No right-handed ν No visible axion No W' / Z' bosons No EW monopoles No color anomalies No 95 GeV scalar No strong CP violation

Blind Predictions (Strongest Evidence)

Made BEFORE checking measured values. These carry no look-elsewhere penalty. Combined P-value: ~2.5 × 10-7.

Prediction Precision Sigma
100·Ωb0.77%<1σ
100·Ωc0.34%<1σ
100·θs0.13%2.1σ
ln(1010As)0.006%<1σ
Spectral index ns0.010%<1σ
Reionization optical depth τ0.79%<1σ
CMB shift parameter R0.035%<1σ
Neutrino mass ratio R311.7%0.62σ
Neutrino mass ratio R321.8%0.64σ

6/7 CMB predictions within 1σ. 2/2 neutrino predictions within 1σ.

Near-Term Experimental Tests

Each prediction has explicit falsification criteria. These are clean kills, not "we can adjust" situations.

Dark matter mass
mDM = me × (nc-1)nd = 5.11 GeV
SuperCDMS 2026–2027
Tensor-to-scalar ratio
r = 0.035 (= ImO/200 = 7/200)
CMB-S4 ~2028
95 GeV scalar particle
Framework predicts NO
LHC Run 3 (now)
Neutrino mass ordering
Normal, with m1 = 0
JUNO ~2027
Dark energy equation of state
w = -1 exactly
DESI (ongoing)
Colored pNGBs
~1761 GeV from Coleman-Weinberg potential
HL-LHC 2026–2029

Falsified Claims (14 total)

Recording failures is essential. We don't hide what doesn't work.

Type Count Examples
Definitively falsified9sin²θW=2/25 (65% wrong), higher CMB peaks (12-19% off)
Deprecated4G from |Π|, EFE from γ
Withdrawn1h(γ) novelty claim
Browse All 50 Predictions

Interactive explorer with filtering by tier, domain, status, and blind prediction flag.