<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Perspective Cosmology Blog</title>
    <description>Updates, results, and reflections from the Perspective Cosmology project.</description>
    <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog</link>
    <atom:link href="https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:37:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>What If Entanglement Is Just Geometry?</title>
      <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/entanglement-from-crystallization</link>
      <guid>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/entanglement-from-crystallization</guid>
      <description>The framework derives all quantum entanglement predictions from perspective axioms — Bell correlations, the Tsirelson bound, no-signaling — with 113 verified tests and zero postulates borrowed from quantum mechanics.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Results</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Solving the 30-Year Lithium-7 Problem</title>
      <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/solving-the-lithium-problem</link>
      <guid>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/solving-the-lithium-problem</guid>
      <description>Standard BBN predicts 3x more lithium-7 than we observe. The framework says the factor is 3 = Im(H). Zero free parameters. 8/8 tests PASS.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Results</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hubble Tension Is Real Physics</title>
      <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/hubble-tension-is-real</link>
      <guid>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/hubble-tension-is-real</guid>
      <description>Most frameworks try to resolve the Hubble tension. This one predicts it. H_local/H_CMB = 13/12. If the tension goes away, the framework is wrong.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Results</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing the Framework: CMB-S4 Predictions</title>
      <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/testing-the-framework-cmb-s4</link>
      <guid>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/testing-the-framework-cmb-s4</guid>
      <description>The framework predicts r = 0.035 for the tensor-to-scalar ratio. CMB-S4 will test this at ~35 sigma by 2030. A decisive experiment.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Results</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why No Magnetic Monopoles?</title>
      <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/why-no-monopoles</link>
      <guid>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/why-no-monopoles</guid>
      <description>Grand Unified Theories predict stable monopoles. We&apos;ve never seen one. The framework says pi_2 = Z/2Z, not Z — monopoles pair-annihilate. A topological argument, not fine-tuning.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Results</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What 14 Failed Predictions Taught Me About Physics</title>
      <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/14-failed-predictions</link>
      <guid>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/14-failed-predictions</guid>
      <description>Every failure documented, every lesson extracted. Why recording what went wrong matters more than celebrating what went right.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Results</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How I Used AI to Explore a Theory of Everything</title>
      <link>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/how-i-used-ai-to-explore-a-theory-of-everything</link>
      <guid>https://perspectivecosmology.com/blog/how-i-used-ai-to-explore-a-theory-of-everything</guid>
      <description>The personal story behind Perspective Cosmology — why this approach, what I found, and why I might be wrong.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Meta</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>